Saturday, March 26, 2005

Bush Administration Probes Syria's Future With Assad's Opposition

The following Post article is interesting for what it tells us about Washington's desire to turn up the psychological pressure on Syria. Ghadry's Reform Party of Syria has no authority in Syria. Murhaf Jouejati is right to say, "It's almost unheard-of in Syria."

The RPS has sent around an email note with the Post article. The add:

The reference in the article "Its membership is extremely thin and is not taken
seriously. It's almost unheard-of in Syria" has been quoted by a Syrian whose
father served as Syrian Ambassador to the United States under Hafez al-Assad.
Amb. Jouejati was known for fairness and intellect. His son has never talked to
RPS, probed RPS membership, or attempted to analyze our popularity inside Syria
as far as we know. All the same, the Syrian newspaper Tishreen two days ago ran
an interview that Ghadry gave an Israeli paper not long ago. Such stories are
part of the Syrian press' new policy of writing about the bad news as well as
the good. The EU invited Ghadry to address it as well.

Clearly France and Washington will turn up the heat. Washington knows very little about the internal workings of Syria, however, as I explain in an earlier post, From 1559 to Regime Change in Washington Think. The suggestion that the Syrian regime is about to collapse or Chirac's statement "that the Damascus government was unlikely to survive the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon," are either spin or pure ignorance. Probably the former.

Here is the post article:

Bush Administration Probes Syria's Future With Assad's Opposition
Washington Post
By Robin Wright and Glenn Kessler
March 26, 2005

The Bush administration is reaching out to the Syrian opposition because of growing concerns that unrest in Lebanon could spill over and suddenly destabilize Syria, which borders four countries pivotal to U.S. Middle East policy -- Israel, Iraq, Lebanon and Turkey, U.S. and Syrian sources said.

In an interview, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that the United States is talking to "as many people as we possibly can" about the situation in Syria, as well as in Lebanon, to ensure that Washington is prepared in the event of yet another abrupt political upheaval.

"What we're trying to do is to assess the situation so that nobody is blindsided, because events are moving so fast and in such unpredictable directions that it is only prudent at this point to know what's going on," Rice told Washington Post editors and reporters, citing "the possibility for what I often call discontinuous events, meaning that you were expecting them to go along like this and all of a sudden they go off in this direction, in periods of change like this. So we're going to look at all the possibilities and talk to as many people as we possibly can."

A meeting Thursday, hosted by new State Department "democracy czar" Elizabeth Cheney, brought together senior administration officials from Vice President Cheney's office, the National Security Council and the Pentagon and about a dozen prominent Syrian Americans, including political activists, community leaders, academics and an opposition group, a senior State Department official said.

The opposition group comes from the Syria Reform Party, a small U.S.-based Syrian organization often compared to the Iraqi National Congress led by former exile Ahmed Chalabi. The INC, which led the campaign to oust former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, had widespread U.S. financial and political support from both the Clinton and Bush administrations, as well as Congress.

U.S. officials, however, yesterday denied that the meeting was intended to coordinate efforts to oust Syrian President Bashar Assad's government.

"That would be a monumental distortion," a senior State Department official said. "But it was a discussion about supporting reform and change in the region and specifically Syria -- and how we can help that and work with people in the region and Syria to support that process."

The U.S. outreach is a direct result of President Bush's discussion last month with French President Jacques Chirac, said U.S and European officials. Advising against any discussion of "regime change," Chirac told Bush that the Damascus government was unlikely to survive the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon. The French president predicted that free elections in Lebanon would in turn force change inside Syria, possibly unraveling Assad's government, U.S. sources said.

Since that Feb. 21 meeting, the Bush administration has begun looking at possible political options in Syria, said analysts familiar with the U.S. thinking. "They're taking seriously that a consequence of getting out of Lebanon will be the collapse of the Assad regime, and they're looking around for alternatives," said Flynt Leverett, former senior director for Middle East affairs at the National Security Council under Bush.

The Syrian Americans who attended the meeting urged the administration to take tentative steps to pressure Damascus, such as having Bush call for greater freedoms and release of political prisoners, said Farid Ghadry, president of the Syrian Reform Party.

The delegation also sought support for lawsuits in U.S. courts against Syrian officials engaged in human rights abuses, an option available under the Alien Tort Claims Act, Ghadry said. The 1789 law grants jurisdiction to U.S. federal courts over "any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States."

Ghadry said the Syrian opposition was encouraged by the "open and constructive" meeting, which was attended by key players in the administration's democracy policy such as John Hannah from Cheney's office, Robert Danin from the National Security Council and the Pentagon's David Schenker.

"They wanted to hear from us how they can help in extending the message of freedom and democracy in Syria," said Ghadry, who left his homeland 30 years ago, when he was 10, and formed his party after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. "They listened and took a lot of notes. We felt from the responses that they understand these are important issues."

Some U.S. analysts and other Syrian Americans warned that the Syrian Reform Party and its allies are unrepresentative and too small to have any impact.

"Its membership is extremely thin and is not taken seriously. It's almost unheard-of in Syria," said Murhaf Jouejati, director of George Washington University's Middle East Studies Program.

On Lebanon, Rice said the United States is waiting to hear recommendations from U.N. envoy Terje Roed-Larsen on how to support spring elections there. "The main thing is just to help the Lebanese opposition and others, the entire Lebanese political space [and] people to get organized so that they can have a competitive, free and fair election," she said.

"I would suspect that if the U.N. comes back and says [do election] monitoring, people will be very supportive of that," Rice added. "Perhaps if there's need for nongovernmental organizations to do training or the kind of things that have been done in other places, I'm quite sure that people would be prepared to do that."


At 3/26/2005 06:52:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bunch of opportunitists cant form a national opposition. Who has ever heard of this Ghadri guy and who gave him the right to speak in the name of the Syrian people? Syrians will not tolerate with those who invite American destruction to the country. If they are following the Jalabi-Alawi model then remember that this is not Iraq. Syrians want democracy but this regime is not a bloody repressive one like Sadaam's so we can wait for our inevitable democracy to come. Americans are not welcome here, we saw their democracy in Iraq!!!

At 3/26/2005 01:27:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hear Hear !

At 3/26/2005 03:16:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So Mr Ghadri is an:

a- Opportunist
b- Self appointed
c- Seeking support from foreign nations

Hummm, and our wonderful pres????

At 3/31/2005 11:40:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Americans can just leave syria alone. we dont want their democracy..this is not iraq. everyone one in syria likes president assad since he's young and open minded and we will not let anyone come in into our counrty...again this not iraq..we saw the us in one even like BUSH if he calls him self a president.

At 4/02/2005 12:07:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who believe that USA is searching to democratize Syria is 100 % wrong,they opted for the evil assad (+ some cosmetic reforms)or the opportunist ghadry.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home